## R A N D O M

Have you ever heard of the term, “random number“? What exactly is a “random number”? Can 6 be a “random number”? Is there some sort of an “order” to these “random numbers”? By “order”, I’m referring to the relation by which 4 is < (less than) 5. Don’t confuse that with magnitude, which is theContinue reading “R A N D O M”

## The Watson “i/j” Theory Part 2: “Pattern”, Absolute Determinism, Dimensionality Reduction, Assorted Mathematical Peculiarity and An Observational Rant From DTO™

**Disclaimer: In this second part of the Watson “i/j” Theory presentation, I’ll be going in detail about use of deterministic math and how it’s associated with this theory; I’ll touch a little bit (nh) on dimensionality reduction (more in-depth in the third of this series); assorted peculiarity on the math; and I go berserk inContinue reading “The Watson “i/j” Theory Part 2: “Pattern”, Absolute Determinism, Dimensionality Reduction, Assorted Mathematical Peculiarity and An Observational Rant From DTO™”

## Thermodynamic Quantities: Defining Observations

In my hand, I have a can of Coke that is 16 fluid ounces in one coordinate system and 473.18 mL in another. Is that scalar or not? Answer: No. This is where the need to define observation comes to face (nh). One thing about fluid measurement is that it doesn’t correspond to any quantumContinue reading “Thermodynamic Quantities: Defining Observations”

## The Watson “i/j” Theory Part 1: Purpose of Theory, Implied Values of Diacritic Dots and Predictions

**DISCLAIMER: I haven’t been blogging much, especially last month (April) since I spent the entire month working with a trial version of MATLAB. But anyways, in this blog post I’ll be introducing an unorthodox approach to a mathematical theory that I’ve been working on for the past ten years. It’s based on the values ofContinue reading “The Watson “i/j” Theory Part 1: Purpose of Theory, Implied Values of Diacritic Dots and Predictions”

## Nevermind Kim Jong-Un, I’m Talkin’ ‘Bout That HEE-LEE-UM (Helium)!

Disclaimer: There is a fair use of abrasive language and coarse rhetoric throughout this particular post. Allow me to say that this post is not America-bashing in its nature, rather my intention is to make those whom are interested in knowing about the effects of a nuclear detonation aware of the consequences of such anContinue reading “Nevermind Kim Jong-Un, I’m Talkin’ ‘Bout That HEE-LEE-UM (Helium)!”

## Thinking Critically….

You know, growing up as a kid back in the ’80s, it was cute to be a child and get excited whenever some “discovery” came about from the scientific community…but when I became an adult, I had to think critically about subject matter that was presented before me. If I can think critically, why can’tContinue reading “Thinking Critically….”

## Where Do You See Yourself In Science?

I ask this puzzling question due to the fact that we are now at the crossroads of “things scientific”. No matter how wrong the climate change crowd apparently is, they are persistent with their paltry pseudoscience; adamantly standing by their low-level intransigence and quite frankly, I’m shocked that they’ve been allowed [permitted rather] by realContinue reading “Where Do You See Yourself In Science?”

## H A M I L T O N I A N S

**Disclaimer: Folks, it’s my utmost and sincerest desire to dedicate this blog post to the National Society of Black Physicists since they were nice enough to ignore the question I posed to them last year (2012) about whether or not a Hamiltonian can be in a “fixed state”. Not only did they ignore the question, theyContinue reading “H A M I L T O N I A N S”

## One Last Post For The Year Twenzay-Twelve On “Things Nuclear”

I haven’t blogged much at all this month of December (with the exception of adding a new page to the blog for venture capitalists to gloss over). However, I figured I would close-out this year by re-iterating my stance on “things nuclear”, especially since I’ll be in attendance at ND2013. For those who are concernedContinue reading “One Last Post For The Year Twenzay-Twelve On “Things Nuclear””

## The Drift Between Dichotomies And Realities

Metaphysics represents a menagerie of dichotomies. Dichotomies are suspicious beasts because we, as humans, think of reality as being more complex, and therefore, reducing to pairs of alternatives would be a case of oversimplifying. The key to unlocking this door of peculiarity lies in the fact that dichotomies are formed by mutual exclusion. An antithesisContinue reading “The Drift Between Dichotomies And Realities”